Here’s Stephen Andrade’s story, written by his mother, Leo.
Just before he was 16, Stephen went to a residential school in Norfolk. Two years. It did not work as it did not have the services to provide for Stephen’s needs.
After two years, a multi disciplinary team comprising the doctors, the school and Islington social services decided Stephen should go to the dreadful hospital St. Andrews. In Northampton. He was there two years. Steven became withdrawn and became a shell of the boy that we knew and love.
Then after much campaigning he was moved to a lower secure hospital in Clacton on sea, Colchester.
He has been at the Clacton Unit for almost 15 months. It was only meant to be a short term measure for assessment.
Here is a film I took on my camera last year when I took Stephen’s younger brother to visit him at the Unit. he wasn’t allowed into the Unit and Stephen wasn’t allowed out. They hadn’t seen each other for two years.
There is no sign of Stephen returning back home.
Since he’s been at Clacton and being held there under the mental health act , it has been added one more year to his detention. The mental health section ends this June. I fear it will just be extended, probably for another year? In the meetings about Stephen, discharge is never discussed.
Stephen is having daily incidents and self harming head injuries.
Currently I am trying to get the medical team at the Unit to look into Stephen’s head where there’s this huge bump with skin. I fear it could be a haematoma. They say it’s not.
I fear for my son’s life. No exaggerating
And I see no turning back time.
I wish I have never agreed to send my son away in the first place. Not just to St. Andrews to begin with but to the residential school also. Because if I had not, my beautiful smiley boy would be here at home and he would not have changed from a beautiful handsome happy smiley boy to one with very sad empty eyes that he is today.
It’s as if he has lost his soul.
Stephen’s story was going to end there but Leo reported that in the past week things have taken another sinister turn. Unable to get anywhere with the Responsible Clinician, Leo made contact with the respected psychologist, PC and the plan was for Dr C to carry out an assessment on Stephen, a second opinion.
Here’s the email Leo received from the hospital:
Further to discussions with Dr D I need to advise that we are unable to provide access to any records or have discussions with Dr C in relation to your son. All patients are protected by the Data Protection Act and clinical discussions can only be held with professionals and family/carers who are directly involved in his care. I would therefore request that your request for Dr C’s involvement is re-directed to the CCG (Islington), who will then be able to ascertain the need, if any, for her involvement and in what professional capacity. Once this has been established, Islington will need to forward us their request for her involvement and reasons why to justify any professional discussions to take place.
As per Tom’s email below, it is evident that the local team have worked hard in trying to find a suitable placement for S and there have been several assessments conducted at the Unit. It is hoped that a suitable provider will be found in the near future to ensure a safe and sustainable discharge from the Unit.
I hope this helps clarify your request
We’ll end with Leo’s own words:
So I did call CCG. They told me to call social services.
Why? Why do these people hide behind the MHA and data protection ?
Surely as my son’s mother I have the right to get him help?
What are they so afraid of?
Why can’t they be open, and say we have nothing to hide?
Why use data protection , to stop me helping my son?
It’s my son’s human rights to have a second or third or whatever many options we wish. If Dr C can help my son why not let her ?
My son ‘s human rights are violated every day. And where is that data protection then?
Where is his protection when an alleged carer kicked him on his lower back?
Where is his data protection when he has gone to general hospital dozens of times with head injuries?
So I ask myself who is this data protection actually protecting ?
It is certainly not my son.
Is it wrong of me, to want to get my child the best care possible?